The third way of branching is to use Mercurial's named branches. The biggest difference is that git refs are transferred when pushing/pulling and Mercurial bookmarks are not. Mercurial bookmarks are like git refs: named pointers to changesets that move on commit. Mercurial only tracks and updates the currently active bookmark (if there is any). Only a single bookmark can be active at any given time, and only a bookmark that points to the current revision can be active. Mercurial's bookmark feature is analogous to Git's branching scheme, but can also be used in conjunction with Mercurial's traditional named branches. Named branches, on the other hand, are indelible marks that are part of a changeset. Mercurial bookmarks vs branchesīookmarks are tags that move forward automatically to subsequent changes, leaving no mark on the changesets that previously had that bookmark pointing toward them. Sometimes you just want to remove some bookmarks from your bookmarks bar: Right-click the bookmark on the bookmarks bar Select Delete from the context menu Be aware that this method doesn’t require any confirmation so once you’ve selected Delete, the bookmark’s gone. This means that we can delete or change bookmarks without changing the underlying commits. It is not part of the history and it basically points to a given commit. A bookmark is for the user somewhat similar to what a branch in Git is. Mercurial has the concept of a bookmarkto bridge the gap. You can also run commands in the Terminal. RubyMine provides interface for creating, merging, and switching between branches and bookmarks, see Switch between Mercurial working directories. With RubyMine, you can use both named branches and light-weight branches (bookmarks). A short overview of Mercurial's decentralized model is also available. Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark how to#You can follow our simple guide to learn how to revision your documents with Mercurial, or just use the quick start to get going instantly. Mercurial supports a multitude of workflows and you can easily enhance its functionality with extensions. Branching with bookmarks is very close to the way git usually handles branching. UPDATE: As of Mercurial 1.6 bookmarks can be pushed and pulled between repositories. flag, hg push would only have pushed up to the greetings changeset - and thus excluded the merge changeset. (dot) revision is a shorthand for the parent revision of the working copy. is what makes it push the newly created merge changeset: the. Here, -B greetings is what makes Mercurial delete the remote bookmark, and -r. It does not remove any changesets that were associated with the bookmark. NOTE: This only removes the bookmark itself. If you can push to it, then you can: hg bookmark -delete hg push -bookmark See the "Working With Remote Repositories" section of the Mercurial BookmarksExtension wiki for further info. To delete a bookmark from a remote server, you must have permission to push to the server. Use hg outgoing -B to check which bookmarks exists locally but not yet on the remote repository. To check which bookmarks exist on the remote repository but not locally use hg incoming -B. Tortoisehg tag vs bookmark update#Hg tag -r $VER update $BRANCH >/dev/nullĮxample Usage: hg_tag.To delete a bookmark from a server, delete it locally first, then use push -B on the deleted name. Hg merge -r $VER -tool internal:other >/dev/null #take only the 'tagging' version of hgtags VER=`hg id | sed 's#\(*\).*#\1#g'`Įcho_red "Directory contains unresolved files !" I strongly recommend making a clone of your project before testing this script, in case it does not behave as you expect! #!/bin/bashĮcho " tags a version (current if not specified) in the 'tagging' branch."Įcho " Options are the 'hg tag' ones, plus" It can probably be improved, but it suits my needs. It merges the current branch in "tagging" branch, so it's easy to see the changeset tag was done from (it especially avoids long refreshes when switching branch). The little script below creates a branch "tagging" and puts tags in it. hgtags files on the heads of all branches. Moreover, tagging can be done from any branch, because Hg takes tags from the. I was used of SVN tagging which was done on a separate branch, which has the advantage not to change working branch history. Tagging can burden a history graph very quickly. For my point of view, Hg tagging system is a bit messy because creating a tag changes the history and needs merging and committing even if no project file has changed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |